Nutritional Evaluation of Maize Stover Silage Enriched with Selected Browse Fodder Species for Ruminant Feeding

Authors

  • Adebisi, I.A. Department of Animal Production Technology, Faculty of Animal and Fisheries Technology, Oyo State College of Agriculture and Technology, PMB 10, Igboora, Oyo State, Nigeria. Author
  • Ajibike, A.B. Research Centre of Animal Breeding, Biotechnology and Transgenesis, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil Author
  • Okunlola, O.O. Department of Animal Production Technology, Faculty of Animal and Fisheries Technology, Oyo State College of Agriculture and Technology, PMB 10, Igboora, Oyo State, Nigeria. Author
  • Muraina, T.O. Department of Animal Production Technology, Faculty of Animal and Fisheries Technology, Oyo State College of Agriculture and Technology, PMB 10, Igboora, Oyo State, Nigeria. Author
  • Adeniyi, O.A. Department of Animal Health Technology, Faculty of Animal and Fisheries Technology, Oyo State College of Agriculture and Technology, PMB 10, Igboora, Oyo State, Nigeria. Author
  • Oladepo, O. Department of Animal Production Technology, Faculty of Animal and Fisheries Technology, Oyo State College of Agriculture and Technology, PMB 10, Igboora, Oyo State, Nigeria. Author
  • Mustapha, T.B. Department of Animal Health Technology, Faculty of Animal and Fisheries Technology, Oyo State College of Agriculture and Technology, PMB 10, Igboora, Oyo State, Nigeria. Author
  • Akanmu, O.C. Department of Animal Production Technology, Faculty of Animal and Fisheries Technology, Oyo State College of Agriculture and Technology, PMB 10, Igboora, Oyo State, Nigeria. Author
  • Raji, I. O Department of Animal Production Technology, Faculty of Animal and Fisheries Technology, Oyo State College of Agriculture and Technology, PMB 10, Igboora, Oyo State, Nigeria. Author
  • Sunday, A. G. Department of Animal Production Technology, Faculty of Animal and Fisheries Technology, Oyo State College of Agriculture and Technology, PMB 10, Igboora, Oyo State, Nigeria. Author

Keywords:

Proximate composition, Mineral content, Maize stover residue, Browse fodders, Silage

Abstract

In tropical regions, climatic variations significantly affect both the availability and nutritional quality of forages for ruminant production. Consequently, the utilization of maize (Zea mays L.) stover silage has been suggested as an alternative feed source. However, the inherently low protein content of maize stover necessitates its combination with browse legumes to enhance its nutritional value. This research was conducted to assess the proximate composition and mineral profile of maize stover residues (MSR) ensiled with selected browses (Gliricidia sepium (GS), Ficus thonningii (FT), and Gmelina arborea (GA) using four dietary treatments - T1 (100% MSR), T2 (MSR70GS30), T3 (MSR70FT30), and T4 (MSR70GA30) after stored for 21 days. The inclusion of browse species significantly (P<0.05) affected proximate composition of the silage as T1 has the highest dry matter, crude fibre, neutral detergent fibre, acid detergent fibre, and acid detergent lignin of 35.06, 37.82, 64.51, 32.62, 13.54% respectively compared to other dietary treatments, while T3 had the highest crude protein (16.50%) and ash content (10.12%). The silage pH and temperature ranges between 4.30 – 4.60 and 27.53 – 28.30 °C, respectively. Mineral composition analysis revealed significant differences (P<0.05) among treatments, with T3 having the highest concentrations of phosphorus (0.35%), potassium (0.86%), calcium (0.27%), magnesium (0.21%), iron (191.50 mg/kg), and zinc (51.94 mg/kg). The findings suggest that ensiling maize stover residues with browse species mixtures can serve as a valuable supplementary feed for ruminants.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Nutritional Evaluation of Maize Stover Silage Enriched with Selected Browse Fodder Species for Ruminant Feeding. (2026). The NOUN Journal of Agricultural Research and Development (NJARD), 2(1), 52-59. http://3.79.110.175/agricjournal/index.php/NJARD/article/view/80